E-health? How about customer service delivery first, please?

E-health? How about customer service delivery first, please?

Picture this: Its 2020, your wearable wellness device (something akin to a Fitbit) notes that your temperature has spiked and your pulse is well over its maximum threshold. Your health implant corroborates this and adds a bit of information about the chemical make-up of your blood. It’s bad. Given your medical history, a heart attack or stroke may be imminent. Your smartphone, which is linked to your wellness device, makes an emergency call to your ICE (in case of emergency) contact, alerts your doctor, and sends for an ambulance, providing ambulance staff with a GPS location, a full medical history and your current vital signs. Your personal and medical insurance information is shared with the hospital you are en-route to, and with the doctor. When you arrive at the hospital, you are wheeled straight to the doctor or team of specialists standing by to treat you.

Pretty picture? Yup. Real? Nope, far from it. It’s inspiring reading about how technology advances – seamlessly integrated electronic health records, smart devices and apps, biometrics, wearables, injectables, implantables and Internet of Things (IoT)-driven solutions – are going to transform healthcare. The reality is that for most of us getting into a hospital the world over can still mean battling our way through a kilometer of forms, standing in line, and waiting, waiting, waiting for a bed, for the theatre, for the doctor....

Trevor Noah’s riff on American healthcare after an emergency appendectomy strikes some parallels with healthcare all over the world.

"How are you paying for this?" "Well, with my life, clearly"

Luckily for Trevor, he had a billboard to vouch for him. He got the surgery.

The ever present danger in an emergency waiting room is that you die in line, not because there are no doctors to help you, but because you couldn’t get your medical aid and payment details entered into an archaic administration system in time, or get the approvals from the medical aid fast enough. And if that doesn’t get you, it might be the broken systems in the hospital for triaging patients or their inability to synchronize theatres, equipment, and skilled resources.

A case in point is how a  public hospital, with the help of a bit of media exposure and political will, is dealing with massive backlogs and long waiting periods for cataract surgery and arthroplasty (hip replacements). In a week-long operation blitz it did 150 cataract and 20 arthroplasty procedures. It’s an exercise it says it will repeat to address the challenge.

Is it then just straight-forward process management? The health department suggests it will try to reduce the backlog by, among other things, monitoring theatre times at regional, central and tertiary hospitals, making better use of hospital beds, especially in the intensive care unit, and buying new medical equipment for public health facilities. So yes, its process management… and clunky administration systems.

Can digital technology, including IoT-driven solutions, be used in a disruptive and transformative way to create a seamless patient experience? Throwing more ‘toys’ (albeit very advanced IoT-based, bio and nano devices and information bytes) into the current mix certainly won’t help – the hospital administration systems cannot and were likely never built to handle that level of input.

We need to get the basics right first.

Inside-out or outside-in?

Healthcare ecosystems comprise the hospitals, the practitioners, medical aids and their administration partners, and the national health systems. Looking from the outside in, healthcare systems seem to be bottle-necking unnecessarily. From the inside looking out, there may be much frustration too. 

Perhaps it’s because healthcare, being a specialist area, is stuck with an inside-out business strategy. This approach looks at how the business can best leverage its internal strengths and capabilities; it doesn’t ask the customer for input.

The inside-out approach does have merit. As Henry Ford pointed out, if he had asked his customers what they wanted they would have said “a faster horse”. Inside-out is a powerful system if the “why” of the business, like Apple’s “why” (they don’t sell computers, they sell a change to the status quo) is strong enough.

For hospitals and healthcare systems in general, however, this approach no longer serves. While the service delivered is certainly specialized, healthcare is very much about people, and a smarter, more informed bunch of people at that. An outside-in business strategy, which takes its cue from patient needs and builds the capability to meet those needs, is needed for healthcare the world over.

Unfortunately, there is no quick cure. Standards, open systems, collaboration and shared commitment from healthcare ecosystem players will be essential to create a stable platform for digital innovation.

If IoT and other devices are to make an impact, perhaps they will do so outside the healthcare system first, driving personal wellness and preventative care. Without addressing the basics – the administration systems – new technologies cannot begin to add value inside healthcare systems.

Let me know what you think

Lee Naik

CEO @ TransUnion Africa | LinkedIn Top Voice | Keynote Speaker | Business Transformation, Digital, Data, Information Solutions

8y

Thanks Chris Rottner for the great feedback and commentary. Preventative measures are certainly the way to drive sustainable reform. Focusing just on the curative side is not going to work. It is interesting to contemplate how the ubiquity of IOT as we head towards 2020, and the combined drop in connectivity costs through the "vortex effect" amongst existing Telco's and the emergence of Loon amongst other interventions will enable a situation where we can deliver the right educational messages to all parts of our nations, informing some improvements in how we live and care for ourselves.

Like
Reply
Chris Rottner

Consultant, MILITARY WELLNESS & READINESS (MWR), SOLUTIONS LLC

8y

Whoops psychology (behavior) at the bottom of para 1, not "physiology"

Like
Reply
Chris Rottner

Consultant, MILITARY WELLNESS & READINESS (MWR), SOLUTIONS LLC

8y

Well said in your conclusion Lee. To reduce healthcare cost, "demand" must go down and only effective disease prevention and behavioral strategies that promote well being at every stage of life can do this in my view. I'm on the wellness side and I place my bet on corporations and communities that will bite the bullet and invest in some form of the utopia your article opened with. We don't need to reinvent healthcare to get a lower cost and longer lasting patient experience for a heart transplant, we need patients with healthier hearts. Its physiology (behavior) that leads the vast majority to bad physiology disease). My bias is to advance the ecosystem of tech enabled well being. I have worked in both the readiness and well being field (DoD) and the wearables and health IT device field (FitLinxx, Zenytime, Next Heath, Cambia BaseFit, others) but may I conclude that "tech without touch" is doomed from the get go. Don't look for Tech alone to solve unhealthy behaviors on its own. It takes a host of PEOPLE, (many of the same stakeholders, but new mission) beginning with the individual, but one guided and supported by wellness oriented professionals, school systems, employees, "wellness insurers" (fee for outcomes), corporations, communities, healthcare-docs and the government (i.e. tax incentive and rewards)...so on. Focus on that system and not fixing hospitals where is't "to much $, to late". Maybe a big player in the new paradigm could end up being the corner drug store as Walgreens seems to be counting on and building for. In the end though, the well being centered ecosystem can not be successful without tech enabled IT and IoT. No matter how gifted and passionate a well-coach (all the others noted above) might be, their not scalable without tech. BTW, good and reliable tech where the data streams good and qualifies people who care. Bad behavior can be cured.

Like
Reply
David Champeaux

Partner, Health and Life Sciences EMEA. Driving AI-First Transformation, with focus on Health and Life Sciences

8y

Agree that digital health needs to be designed into people's lives and organisation processes! Fjord

Like
Reply
Markku Tapio Tuomola

The WayMaker, GhostWriter, Executive Coach, Futurist, Professional Board Member

8y

Clear point. "Inside-out works whem the why is strong enough". You helped me to convince that the bottle beck of health care is in customer service process. Although the process is knowledge intensive it still can - and have - be overseen by process supervisor. It is not impossible. We have plenty of businesses run by CEOs acting successfully as general managers. Maybe this arrogance level is a bit higher with doctors and journalists, but if you can run a software company process, you can run anything. It is just about defining your customer service process and implementing that before your highly appreciated specialists step in. There is also another poimt of view: If you can keep the size of your servicing team small your flexibility to welcome the customer just meets the situation "by human touch". However this can't be automatized because it has human UX. The more human you can build your UX, the better you can.

To view or add a comment, sign in

Insights from the community

Explore topics